← Leaderboard

The map of CoD careers

Every player with two or more major wins, placed so that distance means similarity: the closer two dots sit, the more alike their careers. It's a flattened view of the same era-independent résumé distance behind the comps on each player's page. Hover or tap a dot for a résumé; click it to draw its closest matches.

Color by

Swipe the map sideways →

← the field
all-time greats →
efficient · peak-heavy ↑
↓ long · well-traveled

Archetypes

How the map is built

Nothing is plotted against a stat here. Every pair of players gets a résumé distance (the same one the player pages use to find comps), and the map solves for positions that reproduce all of those distances at once, the way you'd rebuild a map of cities from a table of the miles between them. So the only thing that's exact is distance: dots that sit close together have similar careers. The method is classical multidimensional scaling, and era is never part of the distance, which is why a 2013 and a 2023 career can land side by side.

What the axes mean

The two directions aren't chosen. They fall out as the axes that separate players the most.

  • Left → right is overall achievement. It tracks adjusted wins (r = .93), peak, finals rate and win conversion together. Weaker résumés sit left, the all-time greats right.
  • Up ↔ down is career style. Efficient, peak-heavy careers sit high; long, many-team, accumulator careers sit low.

Left-right holds most of the signal, so read it first and treat up-down as a hint. Flattening ten résumé stats into two directions keeps about 70% of the real distances, so near usually means similar but isn't a guarantee. For the exact comparison, use the comps and metric table on a player's page. The four colors are k-medoid groupings: handy labels, but the data is really a gradient, not four clean tribes.